| ▲ | syllogism 16 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
I want to draw deterministic boundaries around what the agent can do. I don't want a probabilistic approach to security. My view is that if the agent can decide to do something, nothing stops that thing from being done accidentally, and any attacker that can inject text into its context can do that thing. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | uw_rob 14 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Deterministic boundaries appear to be best solved with sandboxes/microVMs/remote infra and unique identities with probabilistic guardrails on top. The old deterministic allow/deny list running on bare metal didn't meaningfully solve the problem of giving Claude determinism. Humans got approval fatigue, and eventually, Claude got access to something like 'python3 FILE.py' and Claude could go to the races by updating 'FILE.py'. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | canibal 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Simple solution, don't use an indeterministic tool to do things that require deterministic constraints? | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | liveoneggs 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Agentic interaction is not deterministic. That's the entire deal. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||