| ▲ | mr_roboto a day ago | ||||||||||||||||
I'm quite confused by what you mean human level AI here. Maybe we haven't hit Einstein but we blew past the average person a long time ago. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | haltingproblem a day ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
It is very jagged and some people don't consider that human level AGI - it can solve Maths at the genius level just like Deep Blue could play chess at the grandmaster level. At this point it is simply an opinion and I can see the other side too. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | paganel a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> but we blew past the average person a long time ago. We did? | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | procone a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Sorry, but what? We haven't done anything beyond strapping a large language model to a "harness". At no point do I ever confuse a human being with a Claude session. Even if I'm somehow fooled or confused for a minute, the context window / hallucinations / Claudeish will immediately give it away. Sure, we passed the turing test for chatbots but we are very far away from AGI. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Exoristos a day ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
With this perspective on LLMs, you are presumably often "quite confused" if you interact with them to a significant extent. | |||||||||||||||||