I'm not sure he was wrong. No one has solved the fundamental problem with LLMs, which is that they cannot be trusted.

Most humans can not be trusted either, that's why you have processes in place to test and review work

	▲	johnnyanmac a day ago \| parent [-]
		Sure. And we made efforts over millenia to ensure that. Let me know when LLM's get those. Otherwise I trust it as much as a human under anarchic rule. Probably less because I know exactly who controls it.

▲

frozenseven a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Ok, so we're talking about applying connectionist systems/models to the messiness of the real world. And "trust" isn't an on-off switch. The goal is to build systems that are smarter and more general. It's a process. I don't think even Yann LeCun has made any strong claims beyond that. He just thinks that his way of doing deep learning is better.