It's a disgrace that the parent comment was flagged. My vouching has undone that but it's likely to be flagged again.

nightpool a day ago | parent | next [-]

It's fully AI generated. Please don't vouch for comments that don't have human input, it's against the rules:

> Don't post generated text or AI-edited text. HN is for conversation between humans.

Also, it's wrong. Many people have since replied pointing out the basic error it made

	▲	_cs2017_ 14 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		The author of this comment is also the one who submitted and authored the article being discussed. No matter whether it's AI generated (I can't tell) or correct (it's not), it makes no sense to flag the response by the author.
	▲	cassianoleal 17 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		> It's fully AI generated How have you determined that? Furthermore, I have also noticed the error. I can still see it happening. Sandboxed agent, no access to global git ignore. Creates a new one after putting the secret in `.claude`. Same developer, same machine, fresh sandbox. No access to the original sandbox's global gitignore. Secret already on the project. Commit and push. Secret leaked.

Aurornis a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

All of their comments were auto flagged from the moment they were posted. Must have triggered an LLM detector or spam detector.

kragen a day ago | parent | prev [-]

It's AI slop. If what it says is actually true, hopefully a human will post it.