| ▲ | sjducb 16 hours ago | |
So do you reject that lead poisoning causes stupidity because it is unethical to measure intelligence? It’s a good thing that measuring IQ enabled us to discover that trace amounts of lead in the environment causes reduced intelligence. That was a key piece of data for banning lead in fuel. The loss of IQ points happens to all kids living in cities, rich and poor. Rich powerful people didn’t want their kids made stupid by lead in the air. I think that removing lead from paint and fuel has greatly improved the lives of billions of people. | ||
| ▲ | vintermann 15 hours ago | parent [-] | |
No, we knew lead was bad. We knew what heavy metal poisoning looked like, we knew lead caused heavy metal poisoning. We knew of a hell of a lot more concrete effects than average lower scores on IQ tests. > The loss of IQ points happens to all kids living in cities No, it didn't. The reduced test scores happened _on average_. I won't rule out that what you said is correct, in that it may well be the fear that "my child may lose 1-5 IQ points!" helped get lead banned, but if so, that's an indictment of society. | ||