I honestly don't see the difference at all. The user intent is identically clear, regardless of the mode of input. What if it was speech-to-text and the software refused to input my clear annunciation of "fuck"? STT requires some guessing and judgment calls too, but I would definitely call it censorship if the software refused.

▲

Detrytus a day ago | parent | next [-]

> The user intent is identically clear, regardless of the mode of input

That's the whole point: swiping is a very imprecise method, and the user intent is not clear at all, so Apple avoids making "controversial" guesses.

▲

ryandrake a day ago | parent [-]

How precise does the swiping have to be before you agree that user intent is clear? If my swiping centers on the letters d i v t a t o r - t r u m p, there is absolutely no reason to suspect my intent was anything other than "dictator trump." If the auto-correction failed in that case, they cannot blame it on a lack of precision.

	▲	recursive a day ago \| parent [-]
		Swiping passes through a continuous path. Even determining what letters were "centered on" requires some heuristics.

▲

JumpCrisscross a day ago | parent | prev [-]

> user intent is identically clear

Which is another way of saying identically ambiguous.

Resolving for a safer option when given a choice isn’t censorship in my view. I can, at the end of the day, type out fuck.