This isn't a "bug" with the iOS keyboard, this is directed and intentional censorship.

Someone1234 a day ago | parent | next [-]

Of course; but my point is just add it to the giant pile of problems with iOS's keyboard. Every part of it has bugs, broken stuff, or annoyances like this, it isn't fit for purpose, and needs significant work.

The fact Apple aren't embarrassed by the iOS keyboard is very surprising and disappointing.

▲

Henchman21 a day ago | parent [-]

They are, if I may borrow a phrase, "Too Big to Care".

▲

intrasight 19 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes, but they got that way by caring about the user experience.

▲

Razengan 13 hours ago | parent [-]

Every big company reaches a point where their business becomes selling their users out to other businesses.

Apple has been doing that for years:

- The iCloud Keychain API that lets Facebook, TikTok etc. track users across devices, app reinstalls and device resets.

- Ads in formerly ad-free built-in apps.

- Removing the Disable Javascript from Safari's menu so you can't easily disable the now-mandatory tracking bullshit on most sites.

- Ads

- "Force closing" apps on iOS not really force quitting them instantly anymore, giving each app a "last breath" chance to call home about anything it wants to send about you.

- Ads

- And now they've added nagging when you try to cancel recurring in-app subscriptions.

▲

Dylan16807 8 hours ago | parent [-]

So the ad/subscription stuff, sure.

And I don't know enough about the keychain.

But removing the easy access button that breaks so many websites is not selling out users.

Giving an app some fraction of a second to clean up is not selling out users. This is a pretty ridiculous stretch on your part. If it had something to phone home it could have done it five seconds ago, why wait? Or it could probably do it the next time you open the app. That's not what the grace period is about.

▲

Razengan 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Nobody was "accidentally" clicking that Disable Javascript button, what the hell

Oh and did you notice how for several macOS versions the "Manage Website Data…" button in Safari Settings, for selectively removing cookies, magically fails to work?

Oh OH and how iCloud+'s paid Private Relay feature doesn't work in authoritarian countries like the UAE etc where it would actually be needed?

	▲	Dylan16807 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> Nobody was "accidentally" clicking that Disable Javascript button, what the hell I didn't say they were, what the hell. > Oh and did you notice I did not notice. I don't use any Apple products.

▲

ftchd a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Anything can be censorship if you want it to, and then it means nothing.

Apple is free to make their product work however they want. They're not creating laws or public utilities.

▲

sli a day ago | parent [-]

"Censorship" doesn't automatically imply "government censorship." This is absolutely Apple applying a chilling effect on its customers.

▲

dmix a day ago | parent [-]

Lack of autocomplete doesn't mean you can't type something yourself and press enter.

That's different than youtube demonetizing or suspending you because you said some word in a video.

▲

preg_match a day ago | parent | next [-]

There’s also levels to censorship, like the chilling effect the other commenter noted.

Apple, evidently, does not want you to say these things. They can’t outright ban phrases due to optics, so they do this instead.

▲

kayodelycaon 19 hours ago | parent [-]

It’s the other way around. Apple don’t want to suggest offensive phases and have it look like they wants you to say those things.

The middle ground here is to not suggest anything at all. Because they’re either pushing people to say something or preventing them from saying something.

The HN crowd forgets that average people don’t know how technology works. Everyone I know would see this as a good feature.

▲

ftchd 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Give them the same position as the people who implemented that feature and it would most likely come out worse.

▲

docmars 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

This should be a preference then, just like in video games where profanity can either be shown or hidden in multiplayer chats. Then it makes the user aware this exists as a feature and gives them control over it.

My rule of thumb in software is: if there's enough of a dispute on how something should work, it should probably turn into a preference available to users. It's adds scope, but it respects user choice in places where it matters.

	▲	ftchd 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Building software long enough I've realized that the valuable part is your vision of it. The opinionated part. There's no toggle to allow p0rn in the app store, and that's good. We can argue about user choice, but undeniably even if such a toggle existed, more users would fall into addiction. Environment matters more than "self control" or "discipline". I agree with you (on certain types of software), and I also don't see Apple as the be-all and end-all or assume that its opinions are always right. This is just my opinion based on my lived experience, both as a user and as an engineer.

▲

Gareth321 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]

▲

a day ago | parent | prev [-]

[deleted]