| ▲ | piker a day ago | ||||||||||||||||
What's the point of saving $25 bucks or whatever a Word license is to use a vibe coded application? | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | tiahura a day ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
It's not even $25, it more like $10 / seat. Because Wordcraft is faster and more stable than Word. Word rarely crashes, but it does freeze. Wordcraft is freezing about 1/2 as often as Word. For the daily grinding out docs, it's way more viable than Openoffice. But mostly, because having a workflow entirely dependent on a single vendor seems like something to avoid if possible. The last formatting bug I encountered was last week. Claude identified, patched, and pushed in 10 minutes. It doesn't do VBA. However, porting VBA to WC macros is trivial for llms. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | alansaber a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
25 bucks is 25 bucks. I also feel that losing your license because you tried to save 25 bucks on MS Word seems unlikely (not legal advice). | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | thatsallchildsp a day ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Why become hostage to a multibillion conglomerate for "editing text"? It's asinine what people are using Word for. If engineering types need special syntax handling I get it, but lawyers.. accountants.. my god man, plain text is fine with some semi-fancy markup a la markdown renderers these days. Some tables, some red lines, some fonts.. It's trivial. It was not in the 80s but it is now. | |||||||||||||||||