The barrier to entry for GPUI might be a bit high for some, but is there really any argument to be made against migrating to Tauri?

▲

hxorr a day ago | parent | next [-]

With Tauri you have to support multiple web engines. It uses webkitgtk on linux - which has its own set of issues, including being somewhat behind chromium/firefox in terms of stability/security/performance/features...

▲

the__alchemist 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Tauri's value prop over EGUI and GPUI is that its syntax is familiar to web devs.

	▲	cpursley a day ago \| parent [-]
		Are there any fully fledged ui frameworks (components) for Taurus that I can look into?

▲

0gs 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

was wondering the same thing; my hunch-memory is that Tauri is not as performant on Windows. but that has not been my experience, Tauri seems great

	▲	a day ago \| parent [-]
		[deleted]

▲

sick_of_slop 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

The argument against Tauri is that it uses system web view so you get platform incompatibilities.