Remix.run Logo
▲ petervandijck a day ago

That quote wasn’t that weird in co text and Sam says a lot of things on podcasts see some https://sputnikintelligence.com/people/zlsl-zr6t-7llx

▲makeitdouble a day ago | parent | next [-]

The quote wasn't weird and made total sense in Altman's POV. It was just egoistic and myopic regarding how people feel about ownership and independence.

▲MattRix a day ago | parent [-]

It has nothing to do with his POV or even ego. It was an objectively true fact. GPUs in data centers do get more utilization than those used locally. That's all he was saying.

▲ravetcofx a day ago | parent | next [-]

And engines in busses objectively get more utilization than the combustion engine in your vehicle.

▲ipsento606 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Something can be a true fact and still be an ill-advised or tone deaf thing to say.

▲stalfie a day ago | parent | next [-]

Especially when you take into account that people are largely unconcerned about true facts, and will gladly misquote or misinterpret you just in order to be outraged.

▲MattRix 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It wasn't ill advised or tone deaf, it was taken by the media out of context. You can't take stuff completely out of context and then complain that it's tone deaf.

▲stackbutterflow a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This is techno utilitarianism.

Also, a lot of things are true but what truths you choose to broadcast can tell us what you care about. E.g it's also true that we'd all be richer if sam altman shared is wealth with us, lets take a few seconds to think why he's not saying this truth, after all it's an objectively true fact.

▲MattRix 13 hours ago | parent [-]

You can think whatever you want about the guy, but when you willfully misinterpret his words because it fits with your view of what he secretly believes anyway, I think that's still a bad thing for you to do.

▲kasabali a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Is it really "all he was saying" when he's single handedly responsible for creating a worldwide RAM and NAND shortage?

▲petu a day ago | parent | next [-]

He said/implied that we would have shortage either way (without data center buildout, but everyone who wants access to LLM does private/local inference), which doesn't sound far fetched.

▲jorl17 a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Single handedly? I'd say the the people using (or forcing others to use) the models, therefore justifying the need for them, play a part in it.

▲kasabali a day ago | parent [-]

Yes, he is solely to blame: https://www.mooreslawisdead.com/post/sam-altman-s-dirty-dram...

▲stephbook a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Sure, he wasn't implying anything. He just recited this fact completely out of context and wasted airtime.

▲esalman a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The whole context of Sam Altman and other tech billionaires is weird. The modern tech advancements are deeply rooted in exploitation, racism and eugenics, concentrating military, political and economic power, and stealing agency and power of resistance from the common people.

▲excannuk a day ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]