| ▲ | torben-friis 2 days ago |
| I absolutely don't want to run "horrific code" as my OS. Why would anyone? |
|
| ▲ | vconnor 2 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| Especially in kernel mode. That interfaces with actual hardware. |
| |
| ▲ | GeekyBear 2 days ago | parent [-] | | If a kernel coded using AI assistance is unacceptable, then I have bad news about Linus' official policy on AI use in the Linux kernel. | | |
| ▲ | torben-friis 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | No one criticized AI assisted work, but the authors admission that the code is shit. | |
| ▲ | vconnor 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | It's certainly bad news, but there's not much any of us can do about it, can we? Enshittification comes for everybody. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | jasonvorhe 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Isn't it great how free software means having a choice? I love it. |
| |
| ▲ | cromka 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Yes, being able to buy a hacked-together microwave that can explode in your face and one that is tested and certified is amazing! Especially if you’re clueless about how they’re made and you just want a microwave. | | |
| ▲ | yjftsjthsd-h 2 days ago | parent [-] | | > and one that is tested and certified I must have missed that; could you share a link to the Linux kernel that's tested and certified as functional on M4 hardware? | | |
| ▲ | cromka a day ago | parent [-] | | Having your code accepted to Linux mainline is the certification in this paraphrase. | | |
| ▲ | yjftsjthsd-h a day ago | parent [-] | | Mainline Linux doesn't run on the M4. So in your metaphor, it's more like being able to choose between a microwave of uncertain quality and not having a microwave. | | |
| ▲ | cromka a day ago | parent [-] | | Exactly my point. Some things you simply should not implement experimentally and tell the people it’s ok, just like Omarchy does to their. |
|
|
|
|
|
