| ▲ | groceryheist 4 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
Funny. This writing has such a strong voice and literary quality my reaction was to think "I'm more sure a human crafted this writing than of anything else I've ready today". | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | frogulis 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I agree. I'm deeply ill with detect-the-claudlish-itis and this mercifully did not set off my detectors. Incidentally, I wondered if this was going to be "I asked AI to generate the next 4000 emoji", and was pleasantly surprised to find some joyous, snacky linguistics content. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | deathanatos 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> Take a sentence as volatile as "I'm going to kill you." Standalone, I’m calling 9-1-1. Tack on a loudly of ryongface like, “I'm going to kill you ” and now we’re both laughing. Add a wink and blood rushes to my face, you flirt. One tiny pictograph completely changes the legal classification of the message. What in the hallucinogens are we talking about here? On the one hand, this is off the rails, in a way that feels AI, on the other hand, the only reference to "ryongface" out there seems to be this article. Even if I think that word could be corrected to … literally anything? … the rest isn't going to make much sense: "I'm going to kill you [winking emoji] — ha ha you flirt"¹ — seriously what? ¹(Still quoting the article, here.) | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||