MIT is a source code license. If you have MIT licensed source code then you already have the source code and can fix it yourself. No different than GPL.

▲

gatlin 2 days ago | parent [-]

It is materially different to the GPL and inferior in all such ways.

	▲	burnte 2 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I disagree on both points. The only difference is the lack of a requirement to share your changes under MIT. That makes it only inferior depending on your perspective. You are entirely allowed to feel it's inferior, but it's not FACTUALLY inferior, just different.
	▲	dekhn 2 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		I think it's time to recognize that copyleft as an idea is not great and LGPL makes the license even worse. I want licenses that don't have a core philosophy that attempts to overturn existing copyright.