|
| ▲ | AshleyGrant 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| > Of course it might be harder to keep a Cybertruck running for 50 years due to all the computerized components. Restorers will probably be relegated to rebuilding Cybertruck bodies with new components. Really no different than any classic car, really. GM isn't selling OEM parts for a '57 Chevy, for example. If you need replacement parts on those, nowadays, you're likely going to specialty manufacturers given there really aren't any "parts cars" around anymore. |
| |
| ▲ | iamnothere 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | True, I just imagine that it will be harder for non-OEMs to make replacement electronics given how locked down Teslas are. | | |
| ▲ | AshleyGrant 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | We'll have to wait and see. I honestly kind of doubt that will be true. There's all kinds of Tesla hacking that's been going on for years. It's possible to get a Tesla motor running without any external Tesla electronics through aftermarket solutions that carry support from the vendors. | | |
|
|
|
| ▲ | Grombobulous 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I am talking about how value to collectors is irrelevant for most automakers. Tesla’s corporate leadership would be much happier if the Cybertruck was selling 100,000 units a year and was not at all a collector’s item. |
| |
| ▲ | iamnothere 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | That’s not relevant to what the person you were responding to was talking about. They were talking about collectors. | | |
| ▲ | Grombobulous 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | And I’m talking about how their discussion of collectors is no consolation to the people at Tesla who were trying to make a mass-market profitable and successful vehicle. I don’t have to talk about exactly what my comment parent is talking about in all facets. This isn’t a courtroom cross-examination. | | |
| ▲ | iamnothere 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Your comment is a non sequitur then. It reads like you’re just tacking on an irrelevant comment based on your personal feelings about the company. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | KerrAvon 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| In its time, the Edsel was more meh than hated. Mainly people didn't buy them because they were essentially pricier Fords and it was a recession year, and Ford threw in the towel for Ford-internal political reasons. The looks were not as much of an issue as people think today. It certainly didn't have the same political associations. Good book on the subject: https://www.sup.org/books/history/disaster-dearborn |
| |
| ▲ | iamnothere 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Thanks for the clarification. My understanding was that the quality issues and exaggerated features drew a lot of mockery at the time. That’s not always enough to prevent something from succeeding (other polarizing vehicles like the Nissan Cube did OK) so the recession/internal politics angle makes sense. |
|
|
| ▲ | baggachipz 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| > Of course it might be harder to keep a Cybertruck running for 50 years due to all the computerized components And all the well-documented reliability and quality issues. |
| |
| ▲ | iamnothere 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | That’s not such a big issue for restorers, there were also extreme quality problems with the Edsel. |
|