It looks good, but the GPL license restricts the use cases

I was just a kid in 2002, so couldn’t contribute, but I remember checking the MoneyMeter going up every day, so that the community could buy out Blender and make it free software. GPL does restrict it, but it’s also only the only reason Blender is not a long forgotten piece of software from the 90s.

▲

buster 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Well.. Old discussion but I actually think it's the better way (sorry. MIT, you are more free then anything). Either contribute back or stay away from open source work that others did for you.

▲

thisismyanon2 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Can you even copyright LLM output? Even the readme points out humans didn't make any of the code.

	▲	ZoomZoomZoom an hour ago \| parent [-]
		In this case you just can't spin it any other way than it being a derivative work of Blender. And this is great.

▲

slopinthebag 34 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

in what way?

▲

kqp 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Three things one must never ask: a woman her weight, a man his salary, and an HN commenter what “use case” the GPL ruined for them.