Remix.run Logo
▲ stbenjam 2 days ago

I'm convinced the anti data center movement is foreign propaganda

▲simonw 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

I think it's a natural reaction to the "our AI systems are really dangerous and might kill you all and will definitely take your jobs" messages that have been coming out of the AI labs for the past few years.

They've dialed them back a bit now, but way too late. That message has sunk in.

Campaigning to prevent data centers from being built is the most actionable thing a US citizen can do, because it's a local issue (and hence something they can influence), plus they can use arguments about noise and power prices and water pollution to help make the case.

(I think most of those arguments don't stand up to scrutiny - as light industry goes data centers are pretty minor, would you prefer a concrete plant in your back yard? But I don't think the arguments are the point for a lot of people. It's about having a way to oppose AI generally.)

▲thefz 2 days ago | parent [-]

> think it's a natural reaction to the "our AI systems are really dangerous and might kill you all and will definitely take your jobs" messages that have been coming out of the AI labs for the past few years.

It's a natural reaction to sound, water, soil an earth pollution.

▲CyLith 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Look, I use Claude every day. It's great for my work, and it genuinely makes me more productive, and I like it.

That said, I live out in the boonies (as far east from the SF bay area as you can go before there is just nothing but the forests of the Sierras). They are talking about building a data center in Ione, a small town out here in the middle of nowhere (not quite as remote as where I am). Now, I cannot fathom why that would be a good place. There's no water, there's no infrastructure, we're not near any internet backbone. Perhaps land is cheap out here, but electricity is served by PG&E, so I don't imagine it's particularly cheap. I, and everyone I know living out here, are vehemently against building data centers out here. It just makes no sense to put them out here, especially with the wildfire risks. There's really no propaganda needed to make people hate them.

▲AngryData 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I don't see why I shouldn't be against them. It doesn't benefit me in any way, it just increases my electricity costs. Nor am I sure there is even a market for the majority of proposed data center builds, if this exponential growth/need for computing power doesn't hold we will be flushing money down the toilet, and largely on the public's dime since most of it is funded by loans and debt. Even if LLMs achieve all that is promised and more, that just means more people out of work sooner and the already powerful and wealthy gain more power and wealth than anybody else.

▲RRWagner 2 days ago | parent [-]

In some alternate universe, the AI companies could have used some of their billions to subsidize consumer accounts, or something, rather than just let 'supply and demand' raise the rates for all the people that they needed to not vote against them. why should anyone not directly benefitting from AI be charged more for their monthly keeping the lights on bill? The short-sightedness of the powerful never ceases to amaze me.

▲lelanthran 2 days ago | parent [-]

> In some alternate universe, the AI companies could have used some of their billions to subsidize consumer accounts, or something,

The "or something" should have been building out power generation and feeding back a fraction of that into the grid. At least then the electricity costs can drop for the locals.

If they proposed a data centre that has it's own power generation, and fed 20% of the electricity back into the grid, there'd be less opposition.

▲Zigurd a day ago | parent [-]

Build power generation with what? Gas turbines accelerating global warming? Nuclear that will come online in 20 years?

▲etchalon 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I have no doubt there's foreign bot armies amplifying these things, but foreign bot armies understand they're most effective when the amplify real sentiments.

And the anti-data center stuff is a very, very real sentiment.

▲AnthonyMouse 2 days ago | parent [-]

> foreign bot armies understand they're most effective when the amplify real sentiments.

"Propaganda is just helping you get in touch with your true feelings."

▲arbitrary_name 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

i work in AI and i think we should hit the brakes: get a better oversight mechanism in place, help local municipalities get more in exchange for building them (no more tax incentives, NDAs, high emissions power sources), those are good places to start.

rushing ahead with the 'it might destroy us but we've gotta beat China!' is silly bullshit.

And the debt financing needs to stop.

There's a sensible path forward that doesn't involve a full stop, nor maintains the previous trajectory.

▲Zigurd a day ago | parent [-]

Your point about the debt financing is important and under reported. Or at least the contradiction it entails is under reported: if data centers had such huge demand, they would have pricing power, and they would have superb credit ratings. Even a company like Oracle gets rated junk, so what are we to make of some crypto grifter pivoting to AI data centers? They appear to be counting on people not being able to find those two contradictory points.

▲marcus_holmes 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I know actual people who are deeply opposed to AI (well, the current AI tech anyway), for what seem to them to be good moral reasons.

I find the attitude a bit weird and very left-wing purity-spiral stuff, but it is a real attitude that real people have.

▲someothherguyy 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

what is the purity spiral and why is it left wing?

it seems like a group of issues that the general public might be concerned about

▲gruez 2 days ago | parent [-]

>what is the purity spiral and why is it left wing?

People trying to 1-up each other leading to the beliefs of a group being more polarized[1]. The naming doesn't imply it's a partisan phenomenon, any more than "right wing politician" implies politicians are a right wing phenomenon

[1] https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/12/17/the-toxoplasma-of-rage...

▲someothherguyy 2 days ago | parent [-]

i know what a purity spiral is. i was asking what this one is about and why the comment implied it is partisan

▲gruez 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

The datacenter opposition is definitely partisan, even if you can find some overlap in supporters

https://www.economist.com/content-assets/images/20260905_USC...

▲esseph 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

Independents are only about 7pts off there from Dems,

▲gruez 2 days ago | parent [-]

Are we just going to ignore the 30+% difference between democrats and republicans?

▲esseph a day ago | parent [-]

The ~32 pts between Independents and Republicans is pretty telling.

The Republicans and GOP are far off the mark from Dems and Independents, aka they are drifiting further from the center.

▲gruez 20 hours ago | parent [-]

...or that many "independents" are just left wingers that want to avoid the democratic brand. See also: the fact that all "independent" senators caucus with the democrats

▲lubujackson 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

I would think that Elon Musk being Trump's lapdog while owning so much AI compute that he rents it out might have something to do with it.

▲stnikolauswagne 2 days ago | parent [-]

There is probably a lot of overlapping factors, for example I would think that the general dislike of genAI in the art/creative scene (which skews left) would play a role.

▲marcus_holmes a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Purely anecdotal from my point of view. The folks I see being very anti-AI are also the more left-wing folks in my bubble, who I know have gone down some of the purity spirals we've had before.

I don't know many right-wing folks. Most of the ones I do know are dealing with different issues and don't really give a toss about AI one way or the other.

▲SubiculumCode 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's both. It's not either or. It's absolutely both.

There are good reasons for people to be pissed off about data centers in the U.S.

China is absolutely funneling money to push anti-datacenter sentiment, and many of the people involved/receiving that money are not aware of where that money came from.

We are at the crux of a national security spiral in AI development that is naturally unpopular at home.

▲Zigurd a day ago | parent | next [-]

Unlike for example electric vehicles, you don't see China showcasing big data centers. What's up with that if China is scoring some propaganda victory?

▲EA-3167 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You know it's entirely possible for China to be pushing this while dropping their own fortune into research, and for everyone to lose their investments.

Don't get me wrong, it's no that the tech is useless, especially for militaries and surveillance states, but it's not the economic miracle or 'new industrial revolution' so many have gotten away with promoting. I think many here will be shocked at just how quickly a fad can die when the money implodes.

▲mehlmao 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Who are the people receiving money from China to be opposed to the wasteful data center buildout, and how can I get some? I'm still waiting for my check from Russia / Iran / Qatar for being opposed to Israel's genocide campaign.

▲darth_avocado 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> for what seem to them to be good moral reasons

Like the desire to have a livelihood?

▲marcus_holmes a day ago | parent | next [-]

I get this.

However, I was living in the UK when the miners lost their livelihoods. Entire communities left to fend for themselves on diminishing benefits with no support.

I see some hypocrisy in our (knowledge worker) industry. The same sort of folks who were supporting Thatcherism and cheerfully calling themselves Yuppies, completely rejecting any attempt to unionise or join any collective bargaining efforts, are the same sort of folks (though not necessarily the same individuals) who are now complaining that they'll be left without a livelihood by AI.

Best time to unionise was 30 years ago. Second best time is now. But this is still somewhat of a radical position for a HN reader to hold.

▲darth_avocado a day ago | parent [-]

Is there hypocrisy in this? Sure. Does it matter? No. According to the CEOs, if you were to believe them, a lot of people won’t work in the near future. If white collar jobs don’t exist anymore, what happens to the blue collar ones? And that is the uncertainty people are grappling with that is fueling the resentment.

▲UncleOxidant 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

And not wanting all knowledge and skills strip-mined and then sold back to us.

▲geraneum 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

I sometimes compare the user sentiments here and what I see and hear from my peers in the real world, and boy some people in tech are detached from day to day realities of life for the majority. Parent’s a good example.

▲marcus_holmes a day ago | parent [-]

The software industry is definitely the forerunner of the changes we'll see. It's being transformed completely, way more so than other professions. So to some extent it's not surprising that we (HN) have a different viewpoint than folks in other industries.

▲geraneum a day ago | parent [-]

Case in point. The more hubris the more clueless.

▲rsoto2 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Yeah it's not like all these ai-tech oligarchs enabled trump to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars each and he proceeded to disenfranchise voters, kidnap minorities, and make a mockery of environmental protections. "left wing purity spiral stuff" people are watching community members without criminal records languish in work camps.

▲marcus_holmes a day ago | parent [-]

Agree completely, but what does this have to do with data centers?

▲rsoto2 a day ago | parent [-]

The tech oligarchs that funded trump millions of dollars got to skirt the law and use their GOP connections to push through all of these data centers that nobody wants in their community due to noise generation and pollution. do you live under a rock? All of these local groups are telling you exactly why they don't want them if you would take a second to listen.

▲Dig1t 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

My electricity bill is 50% higher than this same month 1 year ago. My friends and neighbors in my city have said that they also have greatly increased electricity bills. Whether or not that increase is due to a specific data center, it's extremely easy to blame it on the increased electricity usage of data centers, no foreign propaganda required.

▲toast0 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

My electricity cost per kWh has just about doubled over the last 3 years, but afaik, it's mostly related to legislated changes to the energy mix and increases in fuel costs.

Fuel costs are up for lots of reasons, more demand for electricity could certainly be one of them... Inflation is certainly another component.

▲AnthonyMouse 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

If the problem is demand outstripping supply then the obvious thing to insist on is that if they want to build, they should add more supply than they're consuming, so that they're fronting the money to make your electric bills go down.

Whereas instead we keep seeing proposals to ban them outright, which is the thing you'd expect to be pushed by someone with a different interest than domestic electric bills.

▲UncleOxidant 2 days ago | parent [-]

> they should add more supply than they're consuming

In some places they're scavaging old jet engines and using them to generate electricity for data centers. Lots of noise, not very efficient - very bad idea. https://www.nytimes.com/2026/11/03/climate/jet-engines-ai-da...

▲AnthonyMouse 2 days ago | parent [-]

Right, so why is the proposal to prohibit "data centers" instead of the thing you're objecting to? Make them add more in non-fossil fuel generation than they're consuming.

▲georgemcbay 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Many real people show up at city council meetings all the time to speak out against data centers.

And contrary to a lot of recent right-wing conspiracy theories, there isn't much of a market for paying people to show up to protests.

▲cowlevel 2 days ago | parent [-]

There's a small market but only for right-wing conspiracy protests, which is where those people got the idea from

▲mulderc 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

My neighbors take issue with people getting the wrong roof on their house. Not surprised people being against a data center nearby.

▲happytoexplain 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

What do those have to do with each other?

▲mulderc 2 days ago | parent [-]

People are very NIMBY about these things.

▲darth_avocado 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Because they’re loud?

https://www.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuq/comments/1t7293k/t...

Or could pollute the entire town’s water supply?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/sep/08/us-datacente...

Or air?

https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/pollution-musks-unper...

We’re going to pretend that these are the same concerns as an HOA squabble about wrong roofs? I like AI as a useful tool worth investing in but let’s not be dismissive about what people are actually mad about, because this dismissive attitude is exactly why SV finds itself where it is.

▲mulderc 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

I think we are on the same side. I’m saying people get angry about little things, no wonder they would get angry about even more serious issues.

▲csallen 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

How many people have actually experienced a super loud data center, or a data center that's polluting their water supply, or polluting their air? To me the opposition seems to be 99% from people who are just talking about this because it's part of the zeitgeist right now.

Even the story you linked about the water supply, it was wastewater not drinking water. I'm not saying that it's good or even okay for wastewater to have bacteria in it. But if people en masse are against data centers because they "could pollute the entire town’s water supply," based on a singular case of one data center's wastewater having some bacteria, that gives me pause. This seems more like a trendy issue than a practical one for most people.

▲darth_avocado a day ago | parent [-]

You’re missing the trees for the forest. Pointing to a single example and trying to pull it apart while ignoring the fact that it’s not a single issue, nor is it a single instance that is causing people to push back.

▲csallen 2 hours ago | parent [-]

> You’re missing the trees for the forest. Pointing to a single example and trying to pull it apart while ignoring the fact that it’s not a single issue, nor is it a single instance that is causing people to push back

I don't know, I'm old enough to have seen a lot of public outrage against lots of stuff. It seems like it was substantive, but actually turned out to just be a trend. Obviously, it's not a strict dichotomy. It doesn't have to be either or. There can be elements of both.

But there are thousands of data centers in the world. And to my knowledge, very few people complained about them over the last twenty years. Now we're adding more, and of course again, there could be legitimate reasons for concern, but the outcry seems to be about 1000x higher, for a few hundred extra data centers, than the outcry for the first thousand extra data centers.

And that, to me, is evidence of trendiness.

It reminds me of how in 2012, so many people I knew were up in arms about Joseph Kony. And their outrage was legitimate. But by 2014, no one talked about it anymore. And if I asked them today, they probably wouldn't even remember him.

▲Zigurd a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'm convinced too few people know the history of the Cold War missile gap. To be fair let's take a more recent example of Iran being weeks away from a nuclear bomb for the past three decades.

▲happytoexplain 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Why...? Or is this just a sarcastic way of saying you disagree with the movement?

▲10111001 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> I'm convinced the anti data center movement is foreign propaganda

Exactly! No rational person could oppose supergeniuses like Elon Musk, Sam Altman, Marc Andreessen, etc., so if people do, the logical conclusion is that they've been manipulated by a psyop.

Science is my superpower!

▲thefz 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Believe me brother, from the other side of the ocean I couldn't care less if you drowned in your own shit. I just don't want it on my land.

▲ares623 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

it is woke mind virus propagated via 5g towers and vaccines

▲gim89 a day ago | parent | prev [-]

You read that in the media? Or your favorite retard influencers?