“identifying up to 60,000 informants”

As far as I understand they released different kind of documents, and some of them might be agents’. But at this point I don’t think it is feasible to accurately differentiate who was agent and who only an informant.

▲

haunter 2 days ago | parent [-]

The title of the article is "up to 60,000 former agents revealed"

	▲	d1sxeyes a day ago \| parent \| next [-]
		It’s a mistranslation of the Hungarian ügynök, which can indeed mean agent, but not necessarily. Here it means informant/source. I appreciate the title is wrong, but no reason not to add the correct context.
	▲	zsoltkacsandi 2 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Yes, and the first sentence used the word “informants”. See my comment above.