Is the average web developer benefitting from vibing languages they are not at all fluent with?

A bit like a translator who doesnt speak the language but has Google translate and a few beers in them right?

For example, is there still a massive .clone() problem in LLM generated Rust?

I re-wrote one of my apps in Swift. I don't know Swift. It's been fun. When it gets stuck I look at the code; I have it teach me via analogy to the e.g. mobx/react concepts I do know. In some cases I've improved the LLMs code after learning how something works. In others I work it more like an informed PM - ok the sidebar opening is slow but... its about 10x faster in my electron version. How is the sidebar "mounted" or rendered? I dump tricks I know from web dev and ask how analogues; sometimes that breaks its anti-patterns. Other times I throw constraints I don't know much about - "This is a native version, can we aim to make it 3x faster to start-up? How".

Personally I was surprised how quickly I surpassed my original code, feature wise. Will it stand the test of time? Too early to tell - need to see if I'm still using the native version of the app in a year. But its been more fun and informative - and fast - than I'd expected.

	▲	arecsu a day ago \| parent \| next [-]
		This is the way. I don't know why it's hard for other people to figure out this process.
	▲	tmpz22 a day ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Right fun is great but I'm speaking from a professional context. Examples should be production code at legitimate businesses. For what it's worth I wholly agree with your point and that mirrors the personal project I have. But making personal projects a bit more fun and fluent is not the $10T proposition being championed at the professional level.

▲

mahboi a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Web devs already barely understood their tools. CSS was the closest thing to vibecoding before AI could write code.

	▲	nozzlegear a day ago \| parent [-]
		You're painting with a very wide brush.