In the age of unlimited and very fast content production (for any media, code, images, music, text, or otherwise), I think content curation like this may be more desired than ever.

Maybe I'm too optimistic, but personally it would lower the burden on me so much to have a curated list of *awesome* projects.

The fact that another person has taken from their time, so the hundreds or thousands of people reading this list don't have to do the same amount of investigation to figure out if a project is truly awesome, is in itself awesome.

▲

opem a day ago | parent | next [-]

Exactly good awesome lists have always been and will be the "goldmine" of curated resources. Not only these, I see all slow paced thoughtfully put in content as such. Like take StackOverflow for example. But it's really unfortunate to see people give up.

	▲	NichoPaolucci 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Maintaining these lists USED to be a lot easier though.... Once you found a good resource, you could generally chuck it into the list and, for the most part, expect it to continue to be 'good'. Now, good resources can turn into bad resources much more quickly, so maintenance + keeping track probably requires a lot more effort.

▲

alansaber a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yes indeed this article points at some flaws but none of which I think are existential, popular lists becoming outdated and unmaintained whilst also being bombarded with crap is the norm

▲

a day ago | parent | prev [-]

[deleted]