You’re not wrong about the situation with women - Martha Stewart was another example, her main crime seems to have been “insider trading without political power”, since what she did is something that a majority of senators, congresspeople, and executive branchers - obviously including the president - have done at one time or another.

But Holmes was selling a medical product that was completely fraudulent, and that she knew was fraudulent. There’s a reason medical products are heavily regulated.

If you want to claim unfair targeting against her, I think you’d need to find a roughly equivalent example involving a man, otherwise it’s not really a meaningful comparison.