Please own up to the fact that you self-contradicted yourself in your own comment by first claiming that "No they aren't" and then "If they weren't confident it would make them money it would not be built".

> It's not irrelevant. It is the primary reason they are being built

...and without any implications, that fact is irrelevant. Do you understand what relevance means? It means that there's meaning, implication. You haven't given a single follow-on implication from that hypothesis that actually matters to the discussion.

> Your understanding about the cause and effect around why data centers are being built is completely backwards

No, this is just factually false.

Fact: for datacenters, without market demand, without a buyer, shareholder value cannot possibly be generated.

So, first there is a market, and then companies act on it to generate shareholder value.

You're living in a world detached from reality where "shareholder value" exists as its own separate entity that can generate market demand.

You need to take a high-school level economics course so that you don't make objectively incorrect statements like this.