AMD is reaping the reward of pragmatism, their best gaming CPU skus often have 8 full cores with a large cache for desktops plugged into a wall outlet.

Intel has been chasing higher and higher core counts which look good on spec sheets and dazzle in rarely utilized workloads, but said core counts do nothing to run the apps and games that most people actually use. I think getting dumped by Apple broke them, they're competing with Apple on paper and AMD is eating their lunch in reality.

▲

theandrewbailey 10 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Intel never took GPUs seriously either. I'm positive they're kicking themselves that the AI revolution runs on products they are not competitive with.

They also stopped making 3D XPoint a year before AI would have bought all of it.

▲

zzzoom 10 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It's amusing because i915-derived integrated graphics had the largest GPU share for a long time, but they still tried to make an x86-based GPU instead.

	▲	0x457 8 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> i915-derived integrated graphics had the largest GPU share for a long time Sure, but its not like people were actively seeking that GPU, for long time it was the only option to get in a laptop that isn't 20 pounds and 18".

▲

tester756 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

>They also stopped making 3D XPoint a year before AI would have bought all of it.

Micron wanted to sell the fab that manufactured 3D XPoint.

▲

InsidiousWombat 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

They also have baffling policy of just introducing a feature and then snuffing people not paying enough from using it. "Oh for that you need more expensive model" "Oh yeah ? fuck you I'm buying AMD"

First it was virtualization instructions, then AVX stuff

▲

fweimer 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]