I'm not bakugo, but here you go:

"However, I do think in the long run AI will become so broadly effective and so cheap that this [this being areas were humans are likely to maintain a relative (or even absolute) advantage for a significant time that keeps them employed] will no longer apply. At that point our current economic setup will no longer make sense, and there will be a need for a broader societal conversation about how the economy should be organized." [1]

"Over the weekend, Musk responded to an user on X that said that the humanoid’s Total Addressable Market (TAM) was the entire global labor market, [...]" [2]

Altman is a little more cautious and thinks (out loud, I doubt he actually does) we'll all be artists on UBI, or something:

"[...] maybe the jobs of the future will look like playing games to us [...] find new ways to play status games, ability to find new methods for creative expression" "And I think we need something like basic income to have a cushion and a smooth transition to the jobs of the future." "In a world where technology eliminates jobs, it will mean that the cost of having a great life goes down a lot." [3]

These aren't very realistic or popular scenarios, but the people building frontier AI (ok, well, one of those three is not like the others...) wanted to get them out there. Seems people don't want to sign up for the questionable utopias.

[1] https://darioamodei.com/essay/machines-of-loving-grace#3-eco...

[2] https://eletric-vehicles.com/tesla/tesla-q2-earnings-here-ar...

[3] all on X, https://x.com/sama

Did you miss the whole "Stop Hiring Humans" billboards that were all over SF?

Or Microsoft's AI chief's "I think we're going to have a human-level performance on most, if not all, professional tasks. So, white-collar work, where you're sitting down at a computer — either being, you know, a lawyer, or an accountant, or a project manager, or a marketing person — most of those tasks will be fully automated by an AI within the next 12 to 18 months."

Or Dario's "software engineering will be fully automated in 12 months" or "wipe out half of all entry-level white-collar jobs"

Or Altman's “AI superintelligence at some point on its development curve would be capable of doing a better job being the CEO of a major company than any executive, certainly me... On our current trajectory, we believe we may be only a couple of years away from early versions of true superintelligence.”

Either you've been living under a rock, or you're pretending to be ignorant.

It is indeed very easy:

https://fortune.com/2025/05/28/anthropic-ceo-warning-ai-job-...

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/26/sam-altman-on-ai-jobs-may-go...

That would be true under a good economic system. Instead we have a system where the benefits are reaped by the few, and the masses get to either work or starve. Taking away the "work" option is, needless to say, offensive to those.

This is explicitly about manual labor. The things on the verge of being automated are precisely not in the "sweeping a slushy crossing" category. If Wilde was here to see the things the slop-peddlers are calling art, he'd be distraught.

Yea thats fine but you think they will distribute the wealth to you in particular?

i mentioned it in my comment too

> Maybe they should ask you how exactly do you plan to feed your family once all the jobs are gone and only ppl who have any say are data center owners.

i am not conviced that markzuckerberg stays up all night building datacenters so he can pass on that wealth to you.

> I cannot help saying that a great deal of nonsense is being written and talked nowadays about the dignity of manual labour. There is nothing necessarily dignified about manual labour at all, and most of it is absolutely degrading

That's unfortunate, as manual labor will be the only thing left if AI companies have their way.