| ▲ | Ritewut 2 hours ago | |||||||
They did not. They rejected the billionaire tax in California. A bunch of temporarily embarrassed billionaires in California protected the rich | ||||||||
| ▲ | whynotrand 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
The narrative consistently in all the advertisement was that there was some sort of “loophole, which would allow politicians to lower the income threshold at any point without needing a vote”. I probably heard that statement over a thousand times in the past couple months. That and even Gavin himself got on the pulpit to preach how it was poorly drafted and shouldn’t be passed. I legitimately don’t think I saw a single person or advertisement for it, you’re the first. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | tock 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Apparently the problem with a country having an annual budget over 7T is more taxes. I'm sure that will fix everything . | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | orangecat an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Shockingly, some of us have principles other than "government should seize the assets of people I don't like". | ||||||||