Yes, the cat is out of the bag as to how to create this type of AI.

But that doesn't mean that everyone has to use it.

We're only starting to see the beginning of the negative impact of AI to the job market and society. If if turns out that allowing most jobs to be replaced by AI is bad for society and the economy (super high unemployment - nobody buying more then necessities), then wouldn't it be smarter to not do that?

If that's the case, then each country can decide for themselves.

Dario's "Machines of loving grace" UBI/foodstamp "utopia" sure doesn't sound like a recipe for success.

Which job are worth doing and which ones you'd rather the AI do? AI should enable things that were previously impossible because of time constraints. If time is money and we were previously trading with money, we will get back to trading time. Manufacturing time for instance. Compute times. For commodities, that might be automated to some extent, I am not sure. The friction in exchanges is where the money is made and the friction here may be at the interface with the real world still.