| ▲ | pr337h4m an hour ago | |||||||
Nobody should ever be threatened with prison time because of a jurisdictional dispute between federal and state governments. That's antithetical to the rule of law, regardless of the specifics of the law or the jurisdictional dispute. | ||||||||
| ▲ | kube-system an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
States have the right to enforce gambling laws, even if the defendant calls it something else. | ||||||||
| ▲ | dozerly an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
They allegedly knowingly broke state law, how can state law exist if it was just always going to be overruled by federal jurisdiction? | ||||||||
| ▲ | nilamo 27 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Creating a company with the intent to circumvent the law is definitely something that should be punishable with stricter measures than simply breaking the law directly. | ||||||||
| ▲ | miltonlost an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
They're being threatened with prion time because they broke state law. That the federal government is looking one way while states another is not the cause of the jail time threat. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | ImJamal 43 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
They should be thrown in prison for knowingly violating a law. Trying to play a semantics game (prediction market vs gambling) to get out of it is just scummy. Everybody knows it is gambling. | ||||||||