Nobody said they outright “lied”, most misleading statements are “100% accurate” yet are designed to mislead the reader.

And when you see the reactions in the HN comment to the original article, it's pretty clear that most people have indeed been mislead.

The article is not misleading either.

The title is but then OP should talk about just the title instead

	▲	stymaar 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		The title and the abstract are, the article is fine (but disappointing, given the excitement built up by the title + abstract)