It may not be relevant from your perspective, but yours isn't the only one. Others will find this detail useful or insightful, for any number of reasons.

So, why? Because details matter.

▲

_pdp_ 13 hours ago | parent [-]

It is as useful as saying that attackers used Kali Linux - no details of what was actually exploited, just blaming some random tool.

	▲	NeckBeardPrince 13 hours ago \| parent [-]
		They aren’t blaming a random tool, where do you see blame? For you this information may not be relevant but for many people in the cybersecurity sector it’s very relevant and helps put these frameworks into the spotlight. Sharing knowledge is not a bad thing.