Sure, but you also don't know what your LLM is doing without running into these same limitations. So how is this an improvement?

who cares what the llm is doing? most of the time when there is disagreement, the llm is right and you are wrong anyways.

How would you know?

How do I know my calculator is outputting the correct answer to a 10 by 10 digit multiplication problem?

Because someone understood and verified it.

	▲	simianwords an hour ago \| parent [-]
		And that some one can be an LLM. Does your manager at your job review every line of code you wrote or trust you based on your competence and reviews only a compressed portion? Frankly, these discussions are tiring because there's a false notion that humans have to be in the loop 100% of the time. This is untrue. LLMs are accurate enough that they can be left to do things on their own and human intervention is needed only for out of distribution instances.

It's an LLM. It is by definition smarter than you, and my shareholders know it.