Remix.run Logo
▲ sjdh76 5 hours ago

Yup we live inside an ever growing noise factory thanks to modern news/social media attention harvesting dynamics. All sides are using it on autopilot.

The systems are optimized for pumping more and more bits out. Not to measure/reduce noise and increase signal.

Individually its easier to tune it out.

Intel was at 15 bucks for multiple years post its peaks.

▲bluegatty 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The people doing most of the buying of most stocks are able to understand what is 'tik tok' and what is real.

The bulk of the buying is done by people who use modelling to derive the valuation, not vibes.

Because Intel is a household names, it's subject to vibes, but it's mostly math.

Underlying swings is usually some kind of new data point that, because there is so much growth involved, implies greater swings in valuation. So the impact of the news is amplified.

▲rtp4me 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Anyone remember when a college student invested $700,000 of his grandmother's inheritance into Intel back in August 2024? He was a huge meme at the time; I bet he was singing a different tune a few weeks back!

▲ssl-3 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I don't remember that at all so I have no idea what kinds of memes this spurred, but I can look at the price history:

It was ~$22 back in August of '24. It is ~$66 today in November of '26. That's ~3x in a little over two years; that's fairly excellent.

If he had a magic looking glass and sold at the recent-ish July peak of ~$120, then that'd have been even better. But it's still a very good (potential) return if he still holds it today.

▲mrheosuper 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Assume people did not peer pressure him into cutting loss.