| ▲ | 0x1F8B 3 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||
IMO Opus 5.5 has quietly been a revelation. It basically requires no hand holding from me given a sufficiently articulated prompt. At this point I'm limited by reviews and end-to-end validation of changes. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | chunky1994 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||
> It basically requires no hand holding from me > given a sufficiently articulated prompt Are these two statements not at odds with each other? You can always say a prompt is not sufficiently articulated if you need to add additional handholding and vice versa, thereby invalidating any meaning of measurement. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | kasey_junk 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||
I’ve felt that way since the 4.1 releases. Opus 5.5 is a good model, especially after the disaster at the 4.7 mark. But sol 6.1 is at least in the conversation as being as good and is much cheaper. I farm out bunches of my tasks to Luna and Haiku these days and have a working prototype of a glm 5.3 workflow at work that shows it being competitive. The price pressure is very real and if you aren’t on a subscription then there is virtually no reason to pay the Anthropic premium | ||||||||||||||||||||