| ▲ | projct a day ago | |
Nearly everything you listed is designed to prevent your decisions, or changes to your property that haven't been identified yet, from harming you or people around you. Removing a requirement might just leave someone else paying a much higher price, potentially with their property, their clean water, or even their life. | ||
| ▲ | bigwheels a day ago | parent [-] | |
To be clear, the utility of these processes can be good - but it also gets perverted into weaponization. Local municipalities frequently deploy these regulations arbitrarily as a feature, not a bug, creating systemic friction to artificially create "jobs", drive up development costs, and suppress development. | ||