Yes, this is hardly a shocker to anyone who used the latest models to convert/optimize AI models.

The other day I was thinking about the definition of AGI.

I was asking myself the question that when there is no form of data that I can think of throwing into Claude Code and have it not come up with some sort of intelligent answer about it, is that already general intelligence?

▲

root_axis 4 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

So if that's AGI then what should we call the the thing that can learn from its environment unsupervised like a human or a dog.

▲

whattheheckheck 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Others have though much deeper about this its all documented in academic papers and books

▲

marktl 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

IMO yes

	▲	rsalus 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		general knowledge perhaps, but certainly not intelligence in any traditional sense

▲

dist-epoch 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

And yet you ask it 3 times to not do a thing, and it does it in a 4th way. A human doesn't fail in this way. And I'm not talking about memory here, single context.

So yeah, it can do everything, but fails in trivial ways around the doing part.