Pretty big claim, attention grabbing for sure.

Might be nice to scope out where exactly it is good and where it is lacking ; residential vs commercial vs industrial , A vs S vs MEP, style of architecture? We need better benchmarking here to substantiate.

▲

aothms a day ago | parent | next [-]

Agreed. Also the consistency between the different drawings would be nice to have an understanding of. This is where a higher level 3d domain model (such as IFC), do validation, interference checking etc., and generating drawings from those makes more sense (in my mind; but I'm biased). We did a quick demo once [0] but it ran out-of-date quickly due to the hardcoded model ids.

[0] https://ai-chat.ifcopenshell.org/

▲

SkyPuncher a day ago | parent | prev [-]

“Permit level” is doing a lot of lifting. Standard vary greatly by locality and project. Plus, permitting is a much lower threshold than actual inspection and sign off (which is where the issues will be caught).

A build permit simply says that they reasonably believe you can build the thing such that it will pass inspections. It doesn’t mean that every single detail will be finalized or correct.

▲

locknitpicker 19 hours ago | parent [-]

> "Permit level” is doing a lot of lifting.

Have you considered the possibility that they meant exactly what they stated? That the output is good enough to reasonably believe it can be built and pass inspection,but it may still include flaws in details?

	▲	SkyPuncher 9 hours ago \| parent [-]
		That was actually the intent of my point. Though, I clearly made it poorly.