Remix.run Logo
▲ stackghost 5 hours ago

I suspect at this point that it’s a bunch of techno-bureaucrats at Canonical who are dogmatically sticking with their release cadence because artificial justifications. I have worked in big organizations where The Process, or The $place Way of Doing Things, has become so big that the bureaucracy takes on a life of its own and you end up having a whole team of people who just manage the process so that the people actually doing the work can maybe get something done.

I haven’t used Ubuntu for a few years now but I’m glad they’re getting this trial by fire now. This new era of software vulnerabilities is going to reduce the viability of a lot of smaller distros who more or less are entirely dependent on upstream for security and reliability. I sincerely wish the Ubuntu folks well but this is a sink or swim moment, and even if they sink it will be a net positive for Linux as a whole as weaker projects get picked off like the slowest antelope in the herd.

▲alex1138 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Meanwhile, Debian lol

"If you're not paying, you're the product-" hey jerks, the analogy doesn't always work

▲stackghost 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Not sure I understand what you're referring to.

Debian has a patch out, do they not?

▲alex1138 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Sorry. I just meant, Debian's free as in beer. Ubuntu can be too but I thought there was more of a visible avenue to pay for it. And I just get annoyed with the 'you are the product' as a slogan because you get used plenty, exploitatively, even if you do pay for something. And many ethical things are in fact free

The fact Debian apparently does things properly just hammers it home

It was a lazy reply and I apologize