| ▲ | small_model a day ago | |
The ones that do are at a massive disadvantage, like someone writing out machine code by hand vs using a compiler back in the day. | ||
| ▲ | mllev15 a day ago | parent | next [-] | |
Someone who can write assembly will always be at an advantage over someone who can’t. Yes even in the agentic era. | ||
| ▲ | alpaca128 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
This feels like a photographer telling a painter that they're at a massive disadvantage and that no human paints by hand anymore. Meanwhile painters still exist and are probably not particularly upset by how many pictures per second a DSLR can do. > like someone writing out machine code by hand vs using a compiler back in the day Programming using a compiler is still the same kind of thing, just in a different language. | ||
| ▲ | jibalt a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
I was a programmer back in the day. That statement is simply misinformed. | ||
| ▲ | catlifeonmars 21 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
This is a silly take. I think you underestimate how talented some programmers can be. I think you also overestimate how far being good at coding will get you. Pre-LLM, the job was maybe 30% coding. So at worst someone who codes by hand is only disadvantaged by a manageable amount. | ||