That's very nice, but... why WebGL2 instead of WebGPU?

Lerc a day ago | parent | next [-]

Having tried WebGPU recently, it still isn't at a point where it can be relied upon on all platforms.

Notably I have to use Chrome on Linux because Firefox doesn't provide it out of the box. It still crashes a fair bit on Chrome.

kevs3d 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yes just compatibility at the moment really, webgl2 runs great on most things i tried

vconnor 16 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

WebGPU still isn’t supported on Linux (Brave or Firefox, in my tests)

WebGL2 runs on toasters.

Why do you need WebGPU when WebGL2 is enough?

	▲	fullstackwife 15 hours ago \| parent [-]
		There is probably no need. WebGPU gives in a nut shell a few additional ways to shave off CPU time.

[dead]