I feel the same way about speeding cameras. As I found they impede the flow of traffic.

Ultimately this is due to the fact that the systems are used to generate revenue from citizens trying to live from day to day. Speed cameras don't really impact the wealthy the way they do the working class. Same goes for video surveillance.

So why should we the people give up our right to privacy for some fake sense of safety and huge bill

▲

whimsicalism 8 hours ago | parent [-]

I would rather revenue raised from speeders and dangerous activities than from my income. I don't think the evidence is very strong that cameras impede the flow of traffic.

▲

doctorwho42 7 hours ago | parent [-]

So you are saying you do not regularly go over the posted speed limits anywhere? Even by accident when you are not fully paying attention to your gauge?

And it's not a question of one or the other. It's a imposition of both upon the citizenry.

	▲	whimsicalism 7 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I'm saying that I lived in a city with speed cameras for years and never got a ticket whereas I saw plenty of dangerous drivers get camera ticketed. To the extent to which we expect people to violate speed limits in the normal course of safe driving, the limits should be raised. Speed cameras typically give you leeway over the limit. And yes, I support interventions that measurable reduced serious injury and death while still allowing you to drive to your destination.