| ▲ | gnabgib 5 hours ago | |||||||
You're likely basing this on the (better) updated title.. the original included "almost biblical" in the title. Shame mods didn't document the change. | ||||||||
| ▲ | ecares an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I actually could not use the full article's title at submission time as it was too long, so I shortened it to its current version, not sure if mods used the full article's title at some point. | ||||||||
| ▲ | PeterHolzwarth an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Ah thanks, I didn't see that original title. | ||||||||
| ▲ | kQq9oHeAz6wLLS 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
The "almost Biblical" line comes from the fact that - before he knew what variety it was - he read about a similar wheat mentioned in the Bible. That phrase is actually in the article. | ||||||||
| ||||||||