| ▲ | kenferry 3 hours ago | |
Hoo, not been my experience. AI has an obvious issue with incorporating how happy users are in its responses. It LOVES to "take your argument seriously", push back lightly, and then tell you you are really smart and make amazing points. If you start with an argument out of left field, you will shift the Overton window very easily. | ||
| ▲ | jimnotgym 14 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
Have you tried asking it not to? Claude can be a harsh critic. See the other commenter | ||
| ▲ | jiggawatts 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Depends on the model. I’ve found Gemini to have the most silver tongue and Anthropic models to be the most harsh critics to the point of hilarity. I’ve been burning spare weekly quota on fringe-adjacent physics. I often copy-paste the LaTeX format “paper” back and forth for “peer review of a friend’s work”. Gemini: “Your friend’s insight hits the nail right on the head!” Opus: “Tell your friend to stop wasting his time now, it’s more kind than to keep indulging him.” Brutal. | ||