People hate these outputs, as well as the wholesale enclosure of their commons (training on public data ignoring their copyrights and the social contracts that enabled them). Additionally, despite how it might appeal to a subset of humanity, "we're going to take all of the jobs" is not a fantastic sales pitch.

How can the output both be so much worse than what a human could produce while simultaneously taking all the jobs and displacing the human made data it was trained on?

If everyone hates AI output and refuses to buy anything made with it then in what way is it a threat to people who don't use AI in their work?

Are these talking points perhaps crafted to benefit a small group of people who will lose the edge they currently have to a larger number of people enabled by these new tools?