Older discussion with original source (washington post)

Weird how the original story only got 12 points five days ago, and 3 comments but todays story 22 whilst I am writing this.

	▲	Ylpertnodi 25 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Weekend?
	▲	karussell an hour ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		A few aspects of this article are strange or not well expressed. Why does it matter if Cathedral follows some bug bounty rules? Black hats don't follow rules. And IMO the citation about acting irresponsible when a company "relies on conventional business software" is taken out of context and is about AI safety, not a vulnerability in Slack.