| ▲ | gbnwl 3 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||
Is it really that confusing? Heart rate is correlated with oxygen consumption which is correlated with metabolic activity. The wearable would see the increased heart rate when a person is moving with a heavy backpack versus moving without one. Now whether we can do that accurately with today’s wearables and without calibration to each individual is up in the air as far as I’m concerned. But it seems strange to me that you’re confused as to how we could even directionally infer these things. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | roenxi 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||
> The wearable would see the increased heart rate when a person is moving with a heavy backpack versus moving without one. I'm sure it would notice the heartrate was up, but how is it supposed to translate that into energy consumption? Eg, my heartrate is 80 bpm. How much energy am I burning in an hour? There isn't enough information to say, even if we add in data points like a gps measure of my velocity and elevation change. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||