My company just did this. Still using AWS S3 but everything else is on-prem with kubernetes.

eddythompson80 31 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

That sounds insanely expensive. AWS S3 only makes sense if your workload is also in AWS. Using AWS S3 while having your compute elsewhere is a recipe for an insane egress cost.

▲

yurishimo an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

How much of your public facing workloads rely on S3 if I can ask?

	▲	alubic an hour ago \| parent [-]
		There's plenty of OSS drop-in replacements for S3.