I’m building the same but with a malleable SaaS. Basically when you sign up, you get the software deployed and an agent that can control that deployment and code.

But the process is slow. The user wants to add a feature to their app so they ask the AI. The AI has access to a terminal where it can clone, fix, and push. This takes time and isn’t instant.

Once AI can abstract this part, software will change forever. It’s what this post alludes to, does code, PR, etc need to reinvented for this?

Once so, no one would ever use cookie cutter software because you could build your own and maintain it using just an agent.

▲

submain an hour ago | parent [-]

> because you could build your own and maintain it

One would argue that the effort to build and maintain it is why we have cookie cutter software, agentic built or not.

	▲	theturtletalks 43 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Yes but now that cookie cutter software can be the starting point. I’m not saying to build it from scratch. There’s probably an open source alternatives to the software you are trying to replace. Use that directly or tell AI to clone it and build it in a stack you understand. Before AI, the businesses that used Zapier and automation were able to pull ahead of businesses that were still doing things manually. A business that has a custom built software with an agent that can change it on the go will provide even a greater advantage.