Moving faster is good. But only if it means sending more agents (and humans, that part is important) to do the same amount of testing in less time. Dropping critical work is not that.

> Moving faster is good.

Says who? For what purpose? To whose benefit?

I want my encrypted email company to move slow, deliberately, and very carefully.

I'd like most software in general to move slower. Some, I'd like to not move at all. I hate churn for churn's sake, or piling useless features just so you pretend you did something to justify your subscription pricing, both of which were already the norm before AI and are worse now.

To speak in Apple terms, we don't miss more and faster crap novelties. We miss the Snow Leopard releases.

Oblig. Simpsons:

Homer: “There’s three ways to do things. The right way, the wrong way, and the Max Power way!

Lisa: "Isn’t that also the wrong way?"

Homer: "Yeah, but... faster.”

Why is moving faster good? I don’t see much benefit to it, unless I am a shareholder.