I feel that pairing a real scientific phenomenon (anthropogenic global warming) with political distaste for crypto is elevating a political argument to the same level as objective reality.

▲

palata 6 hours ago | parent [-]

I disagree. It's about believing in something and making their way to the uncomfortable truth.

▲

whimsicalism 6 hours ago | parent [-]

The “truth” of crypto being bad or good is not the same sort of truth space that anthropogenic climate change occupies and mixing them is actively detrimental for climate advocacy IMO.

	▲	palata 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> actively detrimental for climate advocacy IMO. Wow... actively detrimental?