What do you propose as a more scientifically valid study of this cartoon?

Why does it need to be scientific in the first place?

it doesn't, but you're the one who implied that being unscientific invalidates scholarship

	▲	DrewADesign a day ago \| parent [-]
		They clearly want to believe it was a valid response, but I didn’t bother responding because we, they, and everybody else, knows it was an obvious cop out.