We’re in the tabs v spaces of this era. It will be forgotten. No one debates BSD v Linux. No one remembers SCO. Or whether silverlight will be ported. Or whether an app is available on Linux/Mac. Or whether drivers exist for their hardware. Or whether web standards are adhered to. Or whether you have to use a proprietary compiler.

Everyone thinks AI vs non-AI is a debate but just like all of those, it’ll be meaningless to the engineers of tomorrow.

▲

ahsgq 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Indeed, no one will use AI in two years and the fanboys will be fired. Amazon, Google and Oracle sharply down again today due to clanker overspending.

▲

ImaCake an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Is this sarcastic or authentic cope? I don't understand how people can still be in denial about LLMs this late in the game.

▲

GlacierFox an hour ago | parent [-]

Because you head is firmly stuffed, fingers in ears, in to the software world and you're unable to process the fact these frontier models have barely any use in real life outside of generating code.

	▲	Viliam1234 8 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> barely any use in real life outside of generating code. Reverse-engineering code. Finding vulnerabilities. Reviewing specifications.
	▲	poly2it 28 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Never mind these technologies having improved exponentially for four years, being able to hill-climb basically any domain you can describe as a goal in text?

▲

TuxSH an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

> Google

Is it not because they have been enshittifying Search for over a decade, then recently lost their de-facto monopoly on Search due to LLMs, with no good new product to show for it?