I wonder if over time the two will simply merge and become indistinguishable from one another. The human writing is already changing, as the author has observed. The LLMs will follow the change, and soon meet us in the middle!

Or maybe the humans will do the opposite and shift to Sardukar-style communication instead? LLMs can easily match that as well.

That style I would very much prefer to all the fluff people write today and were writing even before AI.

The other day I was writing a blog post summarizing how I use an adaptation of a context handling technique and I wrote the following three lines:

* Every user run becomes a memo

* Days summarize, rolled to weeks, rolled to months - all written once

* Today's runs are shortened and placed into running context past the cache break

Then while reading it before publishing it, I thought it sounded super LLM-y. I didn't rewrite it because I jammed that stuff together before hitting publish because I was in a hurry but now that I go re-read it, it's somehow worse. Dear god. It's happening.

The classic thing is this business with inanimate objects verbing metaphors or becoming other objects. It's a strangely uncanny valley, but I suppose I read so much of this with Claude that it gets stuck in my head!